Du befindest dich hier: FSI Informatik » Prüfungsfragen und Altklausuren » Nebenfächer » Interfacing the Neuromuscular System

Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen der Seite angezeigt.

Link zu der Vergleichsansicht

--- pruefungen:nebenfach:ins2023 [31.07.2023 10:51] – orangetang
+++ pruefungen:nebenfach:ins2023 [31.07.2023 11:07] – orangetang
@@ Zeile 1: / Zeile 1: @@
 ====== Interfacing the Neuromuscular System======
+Related to the lecture "Movement Neuroscience"
 {{indexmenu>:pruefungen:nebenfach:ins2023#1|navbar}}
@@ Zeile 9: / Zeile 10: @@
   * **Examiner**: Prof. Alessandro Del Vecchio's team
   * **Grade**: Unknown, expecting 2.0
-  * **Undergone Preparation**
+  * **Undergone Preparation**: Attended all lectures except one (guest lecture), personal notes, slides, recorded lectures, study session with an actual doctor, studied concepts and techniques from lab sessions
-    * <free text, e.g. answer: How much did you study? Had you been actively collaborating throughout the semester, e.g. in lecture and/or exercises? Which parts of the lecture have you skipped? Would you recommend your preparation style?>
-  * Evaluation <free text, below are sample questions>
-    * <How was the atmosphere? Relaxed? Nervous? Did you feel time pressure?>
-    * <Did you think the exam and grading was fair?>
-    * <How did the examiners want you to answer things? In technical subjects, were precise pin-pointing answers expected or were sketches (and displaying more conceptual understanding) okay?>
-    * <Have there been any things that took you by surprise?>
-===== Exam =====
-<if your exam is structured into topics, create a header for every topic as shown below>
+=====Evaluation=====
+    * **How was the atmosphere?** It was relaxed, the tutors were short staffed so in case of technical issues, you'd have to wait until someone else's issues were resolved. This could've been critical given that it was a timed StudOn exam so if you ran out of time while having technical issues, it would be troublesome.
+    * **Did you feel time pressure?** No, it was balanced well. There were 30 questions to be done in 30 minutes but I could finish early and go over my answers 1-2 times.
+    * **Did you think the exam and grading was fair?** Not entirely. I say this because Prof. Del Vecchio would often miss out on using technical terms in class MANY TIMES and there is not much text to study from. You'd have to rely a lot on external sources to understand what Prof. Del Vecchio is even referring to. In such cases, you don't even know what potential topics/terms you are missing out on since this is a minor subject and this could be the first time we are introduced to any sort of concept in this field.
+    * **Have there been any things that took you by surprise?** Yup, some questions were really simple that you start questioning your own knowledge. Some questions had terms that the lecturer hasn't even mentioned in class but explained only its concept.
-==== <topic X> ====
+===== Exam Questions =====
 * <question from examiner>
+* <another question from examiner><another answer of yours>
-> <your answer>
+* <question from examiner><your answer>
+* <another question from examiner><another answer of yours>
-* <another question from examiner>
-> <another answer of yours>
-==== <topic Y> ====
-* <question from examiner>
-> <your answer>
-* <another question from examiner>
-> <another answer of yours>